London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames has not declared a nature emergency.
London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames has not committed to develop an evidence-based action plan for pushing nature into recovery.
London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames has not committed to embed nature’s recovery into all strategic plans and policy areas.
London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames has not committed to protect and manage 30% of council landholdings for nature recovery by 2030.
We’re happy to share policy ideas and insights with local authorities.
If your local authority is looking for guidance on tree and nature policies, email governmentaffairs@woodlandtrust.org.uk.
Nature is in decline, but local action can make the difference. Find out how to get involved.
Take action in your communityHere are the 10 most similar councils, based on a combination of distance, urban/rural split, emissions profile, and deprivation.
Council | Similarity | Nature emergency | Evidence-based action plan | Embedded in strategy | 30 by 30 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames | This council | No | No | No | |
Epsom and Ewell Borough Council | 92.1% | No | No | No | |
London Borough of Bromley | 86.1% | No | No | No | |
Fareham Borough Council | 85.0% | No | No | No | |
Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames | 84.5% | No | No | No | |
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council | 83.8% | No | No | No | |
Woking Borough Council | 83.5% | No | No | No | |
London Borough of Sutton | 82.5% | No | No | No | |
St Albans City and District Council | 82.5% | 2023 | Yes | No | No |
Three Rivers District Council | 81.8% | No | No | No | |
Wokingham Borough Council | 81.3% | No | No | No |
Something not right? We have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this information. However, if you have any corrections, please contact governmentaffairs@woodlandtrust.org.uk.