St Albans City and District Council declared a nature emergency in 2023.
The Motion welcomes actions currently being undertaken to support theClimate Emergency declared in 2019 and declares a Sustainability andBiodiversity Emergency to support councillors and officers with a clearer,more integrated vision encompassing all environmental issues.This Council recognises that:• We are facing a sustainability and biodiversity emergency as well as a climate emergency.• Balancing the need for economic and housing growth with measures toprotect and enhance nature has never been more urgent, given thedevelopment of a new Local Plan, the increasing pressure of pollution and the decline in biodiversity.• The conservation and enhancement of the natural environment play a pivotal role in our economy and wellbeing, providing wide-ranging benefits such as clean water and air, improved biodiversity, carbon capture, flood protection and recreation.• Sustainability, biodiversity and climate emergencies will inform the implementation of the Council’s Sustainability and Climate Strategy for 2024- 2029 which is currently already under development – this is a time to formally draw all elements together.• Reducing waste and pollution, alongside increasing the area of rich wildlife habitats, tree canopy cover and accessible green spaces for nature are intrinsically linked to tackling the climate emergency already declared in 2019.• Under the Environment Act 2021, all planning permissions granted in England (with a few exemptions such as permitted developments like home improvements) will have to deliver at least 10% biodiversity net gain from January 2024.To mitigate this emergency, this Council asks councillors and planning/planning policy officers to:• Ensure the delivery of biodiversity and environmental enhancements through planning policy alongside the new biodiversity net gain statutory obligations.• Consider control functions to support and monitor biodiversity net gain commitments as the responsibility of the developer in terms of resource.• Consider a biodiversity net gain policy, going beyond the minimum statutory requirement of 10%, graded on a site-by-site basis with a balanced preferred hierarchy from on-site to off-site to the purchase of statutory biodiversity credits.To mitigate this emergency, this Council asks councillors and officers in GreenSpaces to:• Identify areas for further verge/open area recovery (rewilding) and tree planting for carbon sequestration, flood management, air quality improvement and other environmental services (including nature recovery) on land we own.• Deliver a new and integrated Tree & Verge strategy, which is already being developed in partnership with Hertfordshire County Council and local partner councils/community groups.• Require all relevant council contractors to demonstrate and embed regard for biodiversity and natural habitat in the district through ongoing training.
— Full Council (Source)
St Albans City and District Council has committed to develop an evidence-based action plan for pushing nature into recovery.
St Albans City and District Council has not committed to embed nature’s recovery into all strategic plans and policy areas.
St Albans City and District Council has not committed to protect and manage 30% of council landholdings for nature recovery by 2030.
We’re happy to share policy ideas and insights with local authorities.
If your local authority is looking for guidance on tree and nature policies, email governmentaffairs@woodlandtrust.org.uk.
Nature is in decline, but local action can make the difference. Find out how to get involved.
Take action in your communityHere are the 10 most similar councils, based on a combination of distance, urban/rural split, emissions profile, and deprivation.
Council | Similarity | Nature emergency | Evidence-based action plan | Embedded in strategy | 30 by 30 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
St Albans City and District Council | This council | 2023 | Yes | No | No |
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead | 93.8% | No | No | No | |
Surrey Heath Borough Council | 90.2% | 2021 | Yes | No | No |
Surrey County Council | 89.5% | No | No | No | |
Rochford District Council | 88.8% | 2023 | No | No | No |
Mid Sussex District Council | 88.0% | No | No | No | |
Wokingham Borough Council | 87.8% | No | No | No | |
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council | 86.7% | No | No | No | |
Elmbridge Borough Council | 86.7% | No | No | No | |
Three Rivers District Council | 86.0% | No | No | No | |
North Hertfordshire District Council | 85.9% | 2023 | Yes | No | No |
Something not right? We have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this information. However, if you have any corrections, please contact governmentaffairs@woodlandtrust.org.uk.