Epping Forest District Council has not declared a nature emergency.
Epping Forest District Council has not committed to develop an evidence-based action plan for pushing nature into recovery.
Epping Forest District Council has not committed to embed nature’s recovery into all strategic plans and policy areas.
Epping Forest District Council has not committed to protect and manage 30% of council landholdings for nature recovery by 2030.
We’re happy to share policy ideas and insights with local authorities.
If your local authority is looking for guidance on tree and nature policies, email governmentaffairs@woodlandtrust.org.uk.
Nature is in decline, but local action can make the difference. Find out how to get involved.
Take action in your communityHere are the 10 most similar councils, based on a combination of distance, urban/rural split, emissions profile, and deprivation.
Council | Similarity | Nature emergency | Evidence-based action plan | Embedded in strategy | 30 by 30 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epping Forest District Council | This council | No | No | No | |
Lewes District Council | 84.3% | 2021 | No | No | No |
Essex County Council | 83.5% | No | No | No | |
Maidstone Borough Council | 82.5% | 2019 | No | No | No |
West Sussex County Council | 82.1% | No | No | No | |
East Sussex County Council | 80.9% | No | No | No | |
Arun District Council | 80.7% | No | No | No | |
Kent County Council | 80.5% | No | No | No | |
Hertsmere Borough Council | 79.5% | No | No | No | |
Warwickshire County Council | 79.4% | No | No | No | |
Ashford Borough Council | 79.2% | No | No | No |
Something not right? We have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this information. However, if you have any corrections, please contact governmentaffairs@woodlandtrust.org.uk.